Federal proceedings – 19-cv-196

On March 20, 2019, the Receiver filed a complaint against BankPlus; BankPlus Wealth Management, LLC; Gee Gee Patridge, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of BankPlus; Stewart Patridge; Jason Cowgill; Martin Murphree; Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company; and Mutual of Omaha Investor Services, Inc. that alleges the defendants’ actions contributed to the success of the Madison Timber Ponzi scheme, and therefore to the debts of the Receivership Estate.

The following are select filings (most recent first) from the federal civil case Alysson Mills vs. BankPlus, et al., No. 3:19-cv-00196 (S.D. Miss.):

2021-09-30 [167] Order granting Motion to Consolidate

2021-09-23 [Docket entry only] “Settlement Conference held on 9/21/2021 in Jackson, MS. Appearing: Alysson Mills, Kristen Amond, Brent Barriere, Robert Murphree, Tom Murphree and Martin Murphreee.”

2021-09-23 [SEALED] BankPlus’s Reply to Receiver’s Response to BankPlus’s Motion for Reconsideration

2021-09-16 [SEALED] Receiver’s Response to BankPlus’s Motion for Reconsideration

2021-09-14 [156] UPS’s Reply to Receiver’s Response to UPS’s Motion to Consolidate BankPlus case

2021-09-14 [155] BankPlus’s Response to UPS’s Motion to Consolidate BankPlus case

2021-08-24 [149] Receiver’s Response to UPS’s Motion to Consolidate

2021-08-10 [134] UPS’s Motion to Consolidate BankPlus case

2021-08-09 [SEALED] BankPlus’s Motion for Reconsideration

2021-08-09 [128] Order granting Unopposed Motion to Seal

2021-08-09 [126] BankPlus’s Motion to Seal Motion for Reconsideration

2021-07-08 [123] Order on Motions to Dismiss

2021-04-16 [117] BankPlus Insurers’ Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

2021-04-01 [115] Receiver’s Opposition to BankPlus Insurers’ Motion to Dismiss

2021-03-19 [110] BankPlus Insurers’ Motion to Dismiss

2021-03-08 [109] BankPlus’s Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

2021-03-08 [108] Gee Gee Patridge’s Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

2021-03-08 [107] Mutual of Omaha’s Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

2021-02-15 [99] Receiver’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss

2021-02-08 [96] Stewart Patridge’s Answer

2021-02-02 [94] Mutual of Omaha Investor Services Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss

2021-02-02 [92] Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss

2021-02-02 [90] Gee Gee Patridge’s Motion to Dismiss

2021-02-02 [89] Gee Gee Patridge’s Answer

2021-01-22 [83] Martin Murphree’s Answer

2021-01-19 [80] Jason Cowgill’s Motion to Dismiss

2021-01-19 [79] Jason Cowgill’s Answer

2021-01-19 [77] BankPlus’s Motion to Dismiss

2021-01-04 [71] Amended Complaint

2020-11-18 [70] Motion for Leave to file Amended Complaint

2020-03-31 [Docket entry only] “TEXT-ONLY ORDER temporarily staying this case pending a ruling on the outstanding motions in Mills v. Baker Donelson, et al.”

2019-07-01 [65] Mutual of Omaha’s Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

2019-07-01 [64] Stewart Patridge’s Answer

2019-06-28 [63] BankPlus’s Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 

2019-06-28 [62] Gee Gee Patridge’s Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

2019-06-27 [60] Jason Cowgill’s Reply to Receiver’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

2019-06-17 [54] Receiver’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss

2019-06-03 [50] Mutual of Omaha Investor Services’s Motion to Dismiss

2019-06-03 [49] Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss

2019-05-24 [40] Jason Cowgill’s Motion to Dismiss

2019-05-24 [39] Jason Cowgill’s Answer

2019-05-22 [35] Martin Murphree’s Answer

2019-05-21 [33] Gee Gee Patridge’s Motion to Dismiss

2019-05-21 [30] BankPlus’s Motion to Dismiss

2019-05-21 [29] Gee Gee Patridge’s Answer

2019-03-20 [1] Complaint